4 GB SD cards for istDS/DS2, istDL/DL2
P. J. Alling
webster26 at mindspring.com
Tue Aug 22 10:57:23 EST 2006
I didn't say they weren't. However the ANSI standard for Floppy disks
retaining data, is about 6mos. I haven't bothered to look up the
standard for CF type cards but I'll bet their lifespan is a bit longer,
quite a bit longer probably.
Adam Maas wrote:
>Flash memory degrades over time as it has a limited write cycle, just
>like floppy disks (Although the lifetime is longer).
>
>They're consumables.
>
>-Adam
>
>
>P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>
>>Actually some did complain when floppy disks changed from 5 1/4 to 3
>>1/2. Some programs were supplied on copy protected 5 1/4 inch media,
>>(mostly games I suppose), that were no longer available in the new
>>format. Floppy disks were consumables however, with a limited
>>lifetime. I expect that usable CF cards will be around long after
>>there's nothing to read them with.
>>
>>Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>The memory sticks for my Sony cost between $80.00 and $125.00 or so each
>>>when I got 'em, and I have six - 128mb each. While disappointed that I
>>>couldn't use them in a newer camera, I found no reason to complain. I got
>>>good use from them, even used them to xfer data from one computer to
>>>another for a while (still do, actually), and will eventually sell 'em for
>>>whatever I can get for them when I finally get around to selling the camera
>>>for which they're intended. They've served me well, but now it's time to
>>>move forward.
>>>
>>>I can understand that some people may be upset that their CF cards can't be
>>>used in the new cameras, but OTOH, everyone knew going into this DSLR thing
>>>that it involved developing and changing technology. Did you really thing
>>>that the media wouldn't change at some point? Did people complain when
>>>their old floppy disks were replaced by newer media? Or is that not the
>>>same thing?
>>>
>>>Using dual memory slots takes up space and, presumably, costs the consumer
>>>some $$ as well. I'd rather not pay for the space a CF card takes up. I
>>>do understand your point, though, but I think you may be in the minority
>>>(not to negate your POV or situation, though).
>>>
>>>Shel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>[Original Message]
>>>>From: David Savage <ozsavage at gmail.com>
>>>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml at pdml.net>
>>>>Date: 8/22/2006 12:18:47 AM
>>>>Subject: Re: 4 GB SD cards for istDS/DS2, istDL/DL2
>>>>
>>>>Not if you'd bought $500+ (a 1GB & a 2GB in my case) worth of CF cards
>>>>you wouldn't.
>>>>
>>>>You have to remember Shel, when most people bought there *istD flash
>>>>memory wasn't as cheap as it is now. If it had been, I would consider
>>>>it disposable.
>>>>
>>>>For a camera maker know for backwards compatibility, IMO they should
>>>>have put in a dual memory card slot.
>>>>
>>>>Dave
>>>>
>>>>On 8/22/06, Shel Belinkoff <scbelinkoff at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Would I still feel as strongly about SD cards had I bought a bunch of CF
>>>>>cards? Yes, I think I would.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
More information about the PDML
mailing list